Entries RSS

Archive for the ‘International’ Category

Senator Bacik welcomes Debate on Israeli Bombardment of Aid Ships

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

Order of Business

 

Senator Ivana Bacik: I add my voice to those who have welcomed the fact that there will be a debate on the Israeli bombardment of the aid ship. It is timely that we will have a debate tomorrow night because we have all… {interruptions}

 

Senator Ivana Bacik: I welcome the fact that we will have that debate tomorrow night. It is important that we debate what happened on the aid ship. It is another appalling outrage on the part of the Israeli forces. Many of us who were highly critical of their actions in the bombardment of Gaza and the invasion of Lebanon are shocked to see that this is happening yet again. As Senator Ó Murchú said, Israel is acting with great arrogance and, apparently, with impunity. It is welcome, however, to hear the Minister for Foreign Affairs employing strong rhetoric in his criticism of the Israeli actions but more than rhetoric is needed. We, not only in Ireland but also in the West, need to be seen to be taking action against Israel to ensure the Israeli forces can no longer act with this sort of arrogance and impunity and in breach of international laws, as they have often done. We need to question Israel’s place in the OECD. If Israel is to take this sort of action in breach of international law, invading ships owned by other countries, with other countries’ nationals on board, in international waters and killing people on board those ships, we must look again at Israel’s status as a member of organisations such as the OECD and as a favoured trading nation with the EU. We must be seen to take action and we also need…

 

An Cathaoirleach: The Leader has agreed to holding a debate tomorrow on this issue .

Members should confine themselves to questions to the Leader.

 

Senator Ivana Bacik: That debate must also look at the US relationship with Israel

 

An Cathaoirleach: The Senator’s time is up.

 

Senator Ivana Bacik:which is an important component of Israel’s arrogance.

 

Senator Bacik speaking on Lisbon, the Ceann Comhairle, and NAMA

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

Order of Business

 

Senator Ivana Bacik: Yesterday I wanted to say a word of thanks to my colleague, Senator Norris, for his kind words about me on the Order of Business. I am very grateful to him and I look forward to working with him and Senator Ross in representing our constituents in Dublin University. I also wanted to congratulate Senator Norris on his recent acclamation as Gay Icon of the Year by the National Lesbian and Gay Federation in its first annual awards— if I may be permitted to do that, as I am speaking about a Member of this House.

 

I echo the words of Senator Alex White in that it does seem absurd in the extreme if we cannot comment on any individual outside the House. Clearly, we do it all the time as a matter of routine and this must continue.

 

I also welcome the outcome of the Lisbon treaty referendum which I hope will usher in new potential for workers’ rights with the implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. I ask the Leader for a debate on the implications of the Lisbon treaty, particularly for workers’ rights, and for the improvement of work conditions through implementation of the charter.

 

Not only was the result very welcome for Ireland generally, and for the protection of human rights for all of us, but it was also very welcome in that we saw the defeat of a group that might be described as the armed or paramilitary wing of the Catholic Church, namely, Coir. Perhaps now that the Catholic Church has disowned Co´ ir it might better be described as the dissident wing, or “Continuity Catholics”. It was very welcome to see that organisation defeated. Its posturing and the manipulation of the truth in its posters backfired on the whole campaign against the Lisbon treaty. I say that, knowing there were very many people who voted “No” for very good and rational reasons whom I do not denigrate in any way. The Coir campaign was dishonest in the extreme.

 

Now we are back to real politics with a vengeance. People outside are not only discussing the resignation of the Ceann Comhairle last night — which I believe was a correct decision — but there is an ongoing debate about NAMA. I ask the Leader to give time in this House for us to debate NAMA properly and in an informed manner, with answers to the questions that need to be asked.

 

I refer, in particular, to the question Fintan O’Toole, if I may mention his name, has been asking, namely, why we are spending billions of euro propping up a zombie bank, Anglo Irish Bank. That must be the most burning question because it raises doubt about the Government’s plan to implement NAMA. NAMA clearly has many flaws as a whole. Many of us have questioned the very idea of it and have suggested alternatives. However, Anglo Irish Bank is the bank or institution that perhaps exposes most drastically the extraordinary flaws and the extraordinary gamble the Irish taxpayer is being asked to take with NAMA. We need that debate in an informed environment where we will get answers to questions.

 

Why I’m Voting Yes to Lisbon

Monday, September 28th, 2009

 

Why vote yes to Lisbon? Over the past few weeks, we have been bombarded with arguments from both sides on the great referendum debate. These have often descended into point-scoring, name-calling and manipulation of the Treaty itself. Leaving aside all that, I believe that there are four simple reasons to vote yes on 2nd October. These are: stronger human rights protection; greater democracy in EU decision-making; more efficiency in an enlarged Union; and finally, increased financial security.

I am most passionate about the first reason. If passed, the Lisbon Treaty would make the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights legally binding. This Charter sets out a wide range of human rights, including the right to liberty, to privacy, and to freedom of thought. Article 21 of the Charter bans discrimination on a range of grounds, specifically including sexual orientation. As a lawyer who works with the fundamental rights provisions of the Irish Constitution in our own courts, I am very excited about the prospect of using this Charter to increase the human rights protections of our citizens. I believe that it could be used to enhance the rights of women, of gay people, of ethnic minorities, of people with disabilities and of other disadvantaged groups. It goes further than our own Constitution in guaranteeing rights of workers, such as the right to engage in collective bargaining and the right to fair working conditions. It even includes socio-economic guarantees like the right to social security, and to healthcare. Not all the rights it guarantees can be exercised yet, and many sections are still only aspirational; but there is a great deal of scope for future development. Not only that, but the Lisbon Treaty also allows the EU to sign up to the European Convention on Human Rights. The Convention has already been very effective in protecting human rights in specific cases, like that taken to the European Court of Human Rights against Ireland by David Norris in the 1980s, which led to the decriminalisation of homosexuality here.

Apart from the increased human rights protection the Treaty would provide, it would also create greater democracy in EU decision-making. Lisbon gives the European Parliament a stronger role in making European legislation; it provides for greater scrutiny of draft EU laws by national parliaments; and for the first time it allows citizens to invite the Commission to take up particular issues, through the right to petition in the new citizens’ initiative, which can be activated by one million EU citizens. More exciting possibilities there.

A third critical factor is that Lisbon would make the Union work more efficiently, by making key structural changes to enable more states to join in future. Personally, I would love to see the Union expand to include countries like Croatia, the Balkan states, and former Soviet republics like Georgia and Ukraine. This would present extraordinary opportunities for greater peace, progress and prosperity for many deeply disadvantaged peoples living in poverty just beyond the European borders.

 

Finally, it is in our own self-interest to vote yes. We face a massive financial crisis, with soaring unemployment and a horrifying level of national debt - which will be worsened if NAMA is passed. The joke going around among international bankers was that Ireland and Iceland were only different by one letter and a few months. But, critically for us, there was another major difference. Ireland is within the EU Euro zone, and thus we have much greater financial security than any isolated state, with the backing of the European Central Bank. To put it bluntly, the EU cannot afford to have a member of the Eurozone go bankrupt; the ECB would bail us out before the IMF ever got called in. But we need the continued goodwill of our fellow Member States to ensure our own economic security; and we risk losing that with a ‘No’ vote.

 

Many of those opposing the Treaty have argued that the EU favours the free market too strongly. Yet in each member state, including Ireland, the excesses of the free market have been significantly curbed over many decades by EU laws; on the environment, on gender equality, and on workers’ rights, for example. Adoption of the Lisbon Treaty and the Charter would enable development of greater social and human rights protections for citizens – and would move us towards the left-wing vision of a ‘social Europe’. For that reason alone, I believe that it’s worth voting yes.

 

Senator Bacik speaking on the Pharmacy Issue, Gaza, the debate on Blasphemy Laws, and the Tree Stump in Rathkeale

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

Order of Business

Senator Ivana Bacik:  I echo the words of Senator Coghlan and again call on the Leader to ensure we have a debate on the pharmacy issue with the Minister for Health and Children next week. I believe he has already promised and I would like him to confirm it.

I also support Senator Ó Murchú’s call for an all-party motion to be adopted in this House on the need for humanitarian relief to get through to the beleaguered people of Gaza who have been suffering so badly since their bombardment by Israel earlier this year. Yesterday, Senator Ó Murchú and I along with others had the privilege of meeting Derek Graham, one of the people from the Free Gaza Movement who was detained by the Israeli authorities when the ship on which he and Mairéad Corrigan Maguire were travelling was detained. That ship was trying to bring humanitarian supplies through to Gaza. Derek Graham’s account of the dreadful conditions in which people are living in Gaza made chilling hearing. Senator Ó Murchú and I promised him that we would do our best to try to ensure adoption of an all-party motion condemning the actions of Israel and Egypt in blocking humanitarian relief getting through to Gaza. I urge the Leader to arrange for the adoption of such a motion.

On a day that we will debate the blasphemy laws, it is nice to be able to agree for once, which I rarely do, with a Catholic priest, Fr. Willie Russell, who I note from an article on the front page of The Irish Times, is the local parish priest in Rathkeale in County Limerick. He has been rather critical of people there who appear to be paying homage or worshipping a tree stump which they believe depicts an image of the Blessed Virgin Mary.

(Comments in the Chamber)

Fr. Russell might be at risk of being found guilty of blasphemy since he is being critical, grossly abusive or insulting to people of a religion who seem to want to worship a tree. We should be mindful of the danger of introducing an offence like blasphemy in light of the sort of events that we are seeing in Rathkeale in Limerick.

Senator Bacik speaking on Criminal Justice Legislation and Israel

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

 

Order of Business

 

Senator Ivana Bacik: I join others in criticising the management of the Order of Business

this week and next week. It is not just that we are looking for more time to whinge about particular measures of criminal justice legislation. These are very important items of legislation for victims of crime, for those who may be charged with crimes and for all of us in society. When a previous Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, former Deputy Michael McDowell, was putting what became the Criminal Justice Act 2007 through the Oireachtas, a letter from the Irish Criminal Bar Association alerted him during the course of the debate to a fundamental flaw in the Bill, which was amended as a result.

 

It is very important for the sake of ensuring robust criminal justice legislation in particular that we are given adequate time to deal with the Bill. I ask the Leader to give the House some indication as to what time we have to debate this most important Criminal Justice (Amendment) Bill, which it seems may be before the Seanad at the beginning of next week. We have already had the Criminal Justice (Surveillance) Bill rushed through. We shall have the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill tomorrow and that is not to speak of the other important Bills we have to deal with today, tomorrow and Thursday.

 

I join others in welcoming the return of Ms Mairéad Corrigan-Maguire and Mr. Derek Graham from Israel. This House needs to condemn wholeheartedly the action of Israel in kidnapping them, when all they were trying to do was to bring aid to the beleaguered people of Gaza, who have been suffering so badly since the Israeli bombardment and who still cannot rebuild their homes and lives because of the ongoing blockade. We need to ensure this issue remains under debate.

 

I am grateful to Senator Mullen for clarifying the matters he said Senator O’Toole and I had been confused about concerning family choice as regards children’s education. I do not believe we were confused, but very clear about the figures as regards what families want for their children. What parents want is choice, which they are not getting at present, with more than 90% of schools at national level controlled by the Catholic Church. However, I am very envious of Senator Mullen’s ability to produce a new survey for every particular mood or view he wishes to express. I wish I had that same capacity.

 

Senator Bacik calls for a dabate on Prisons, and a debate on Iran.

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

 

Order of Business

 

Senator Ivana Bacik: I support Senator Mary White’s call for a debate on prisons, which is long overdue. The work of the Irish Penal Reform Trust to which she referred has been important in generating debate on prisons and on the need to ensure alternatives to custody.

 

It must be stressed that there are other ways to impose sanctions on those who fail to pay debts or fines. Prison is not the appropriate method. St. Patrick’s Institution, which Senator Mary White mentioned, has been recommended for closure for more than 20 years. It is recognised internationally as being an inhumane institution in which there is almost no prospect of rehabilitation for its inmates, who tend to go on from there to the adult Mountjoy Prison. While on this subject, I have visited Mountjoy Prison many times and have raised the issue of the appalling conditions there many times. It is utterly inhumane that in 2009, adults still are slopping out in their own overcrowded cells, which were designed for one person.

 

I ask the Leader for a debate on this issue as a matter of urgency, especially in light of recent reports to the effect that the move to Thornton Hall apparently may not go ahead or will be delayed, in which case people will be living in such dreadful conditions in Mountjoy Prison for much longer than was anticipated.

 

I also seek a debate on the need for additional prison places at Thornton Hall. While the conditions there will be better, this will represent an unfortunate step in that it will greatly increase the number of prison places available at a time when Members should be debating the need to lock up so many people in institutions in which there is so little prospect of rehabilitation.

 

I also renew the call I made yesterday for a debate on Iran. All Members should be deeply concerned about the brutal oppression of peaceful demonstrations. Clearly, it is not up to any Member to support a particular politician in Iran. However, all Members should be concerned about the manner in which the regime is putting down demonstrations. I refer in particular to the dreadfully distressing pictures that are widespread on the Internet, of a young woman, Neda Soltani, who apparently was shot point-blank by government forces as she simply stood on the sidelines of a demonstration. The Iranian ambassador should be called in and the Minister for Foreign Affairs should express his concern. I ask the Leader to invite the Minister for Foreign Affairs to the House in order that Members can ask him to so do.