Entries RSS

Archive for the ‘Europe’ Category

All-Woman Platform Calls for YES vote on Lisbon

Monday, September 28th, 2009

ALL-WOMAN PLATFORM CALLS FOR YES VOTE

 

A woman-only platform called upon Irish women to vote yes to Lisbon at a press conference held by the Charter Group at 11am in Buswells Hotel, Dublin, today Monday 28th September.

The press conference highlighted the immense gains for women in Ireland brought about by our membership of the EU over nearly four decades. Four leading feminist politicians represented each of those decades:

Former Senator Mary Henry – the 1970s – Equal Pay - Dr. Henry emphasised the importance of the introduction of equal pay for Irish women following the EEC Directive, implemented in Ireland in 1974.

Joan Burton TD – the 1980s – Maternity Rights - Deputy Burton spoke of the significance that EU membership had for her generation of women who became politically active in the 1980s.

Senator Ivana Bacik – the 1990s – Parental Leave - Senator Bacik spoke of the gains for women workers represented by the introduction of the Parental Leave directive in 1996. This has greatly improved the quality of life for Irish parents in the workplace, and for their children.

Councillor Maria Parodi – the 2000s – Greater Equality - Maria, who was elected a Labour Councillor for Dublin’s South-East Inner City in June 2009, spoke of the potential importance of the Charter of Fundamental Rights for her generation of younger Irish women.

Speaking at the press conference, Senator Ivana Bacik said:

"As a Vice-Chair of the Charter Group, I wanted to express our support for the equality provisions in the Charter of Fundamental Rights which Lisbon will incorporate into EU law for the first time. It is vital that we support Lisbon, in order to see further advancement of women’s rights in Ireland."

ENDS

Why I’m Voting Yes to Lisbon

Monday, September 28th, 2009

 

Why vote yes to Lisbon? Over the past few weeks, we have been bombarded with arguments from both sides on the great referendum debate. These have often descended into point-scoring, name-calling and manipulation of the Treaty itself. Leaving aside all that, I believe that there are four simple reasons to vote yes on 2nd October. These are: stronger human rights protection; greater democracy in EU decision-making; more efficiency in an enlarged Union; and finally, increased financial security.

I am most passionate about the first reason. If passed, the Lisbon Treaty would make the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights legally binding. This Charter sets out a wide range of human rights, including the right to liberty, to privacy, and to freedom of thought. Article 21 of the Charter bans discrimination on a range of grounds, specifically including sexual orientation. As a lawyer who works with the fundamental rights provisions of the Irish Constitution in our own courts, I am very excited about the prospect of using this Charter to increase the human rights protections of our citizens. I believe that it could be used to enhance the rights of women, of gay people, of ethnic minorities, of people with disabilities and of other disadvantaged groups. It goes further than our own Constitution in guaranteeing rights of workers, such as the right to engage in collective bargaining and the right to fair working conditions. It even includes socio-economic guarantees like the right to social security, and to healthcare. Not all the rights it guarantees can be exercised yet, and many sections are still only aspirational; but there is a great deal of scope for future development. Not only that, but the Lisbon Treaty also allows the EU to sign up to the European Convention on Human Rights. The Convention has already been very effective in protecting human rights in specific cases, like that taken to the European Court of Human Rights against Ireland by David Norris in the 1980s, which led to the decriminalisation of homosexuality here.

Apart from the increased human rights protection the Treaty would provide, it would also create greater democracy in EU decision-making. Lisbon gives the European Parliament a stronger role in making European legislation; it provides for greater scrutiny of draft EU laws by national parliaments; and for the first time it allows citizens to invite the Commission to take up particular issues, through the right to petition in the new citizens’ initiative, which can be activated by one million EU citizens. More exciting possibilities there.

A third critical factor is that Lisbon would make the Union work more efficiently, by making key structural changes to enable more states to join in future. Personally, I would love to see the Union expand to include countries like Croatia, the Balkan states, and former Soviet republics like Georgia and Ukraine. This would present extraordinary opportunities for greater peace, progress and prosperity for many deeply disadvantaged peoples living in poverty just beyond the European borders.

 

Finally, it is in our own self-interest to vote yes. We face a massive financial crisis, with soaring unemployment and a horrifying level of national debt - which will be worsened if NAMA is passed. The joke going around among international bankers was that Ireland and Iceland were only different by one letter and a few months. But, critically for us, there was another major difference. Ireland is within the EU Euro zone, and thus we have much greater financial security than any isolated state, with the backing of the European Central Bank. To put it bluntly, the EU cannot afford to have a member of the Eurozone go bankrupt; the ECB would bail us out before the IMF ever got called in. But we need the continued goodwill of our fellow Member States to ensure our own economic security; and we risk losing that with a ‘No’ vote.

 

Many of those opposing the Treaty have argued that the EU favours the free market too strongly. Yet in each member state, including Ireland, the excesses of the free market have been significantly curbed over many decades by EU laws; on the environment, on gender equality, and on workers’ rights, for example. Adoption of the Lisbon Treaty and the Charter would enable development of greater social and human rights protections for citizens – and would move us towards the left-wing vision of a ‘social Europe’. For that reason alone, I believe that it’s worth voting yes.

 

Lisbon Treaty & Women

Thursday, June 5th, 2008

Order of Business

Senator Ivana Bacik: Since everyone has been mentioning the Lisbon treaty this morning, with Senators on the Independent benches coming out of the closet to indicate the way they shall be voting, I declare that I shall be voting “Yes” . I note with concern, however, that a commentator remarked in the newspapers last week how few prominent women were coming out on the “Yes” side. This is yet another indictment of the very poor pro-treaty campaign being run by the Government. The strongest arguments in favour of the “Yes” position have come from the Opposition. The Government needs to be doing much more in the last few days of the campaign, in particular, putting women forward to argue for the “Yes” side, because they comprise a large group of undecided voters at this point.

Senator de Búrca commented on the odds in favour of the “No” side. I notice one punter placed a bet of €10,000 on the “No” side to win, so let us just hope he or she got it wrong. We do not know whether it was a sterling bet, of course.

The arguments in favour of the Lisbon treaty are very strong, from a feminist perspective, particularly because of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and also because of what the European Union has done to date in terms of promoting gender equality. That is very important and needs to be put on the record. However, it is also important to stress that the treaty will facilitate further expansion of the EU eastwards. That is something all of us should very much support and be in favour of. It is another reason for supporting the treaty, although I was slightly hesitant in declaring all this because I backed Hilary Clinton and it has been proven this week to be the wrong course, so perhaps I shall not be putting any bets.

On a more serious note I want to ask the Leader for a debate on No. 21 on the Order Paper, a motion which I have table dealing with the issue of genital mutilation. A report has been published by the Women’s Health Council of Ireland calling for legislation. It is a literature review which is examining this issue and which is particularly serious for women in developing countries. It is becoming increasingly serious in Europe for women who come here from other countries. Female genital mutilation, or cutting, is a brutal practice, which needs to be outlawed and specifically criminalised, even in European countries. I have been active on a campaign to do that. I have a motion on it before the House and the women’s health council is again saying that specific legislation is a necessary, although insufficient element, to counter this barbaric practice in this country.